The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003).

D. A. Pizarro and P. Bloom (see record 2002-08416-009) argued against the social intuitionist model of moral judgment in the current author's article (see record 2001-18918-008) and for a modified rationalist model. This reply responds to their 2 main arguments by demonstrating that an intuitionist model allows for malleability and flexibility in judgment, and it allows for cases of moral deliberation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)