Distinguishing and relating higher-order and first-order processes by expressiveness

This is a paper on distinguishing and relating two important kinds of calculi through expressiveness, settling some critical but long unanswered questions. The delimitation of higher-order and first-order process calculi is a basic and pivotal topic in the study of process theory. Particularly, expressiveness studies mutual encodability, which helps decide whether process-passing or name-passing is more fundamental, and the way they ought to be used in both theory and practice. In this paper, we contribute to such demarcation with three major results. Firstly $\pi $ (first-order pi-calculus) can faithfully express $\varPi $ (basic higher-order pi-calculus). The calculus $\varPi $ has the elementary operators (input, output, composition and restriction). This actually is a corollary of a more general result, that $\pi $ can encode $\varPi ^r$ ( $\varPi $ enriched with the relabelling operator). Secondly $\varPi $ cannot interpret $\pi $ reasonably. This is of more significance since it separates $\varPi $ and $\pi $ by drawing a well-defined boundary. Thirdly an encoding from $\pi $ to $\varPi ^r$ is revisited and discussed, which not only implies how to make $\varPi $ more useful but also stresses the importance of name-passing in $\pi $ .