| 普通钢筋混凝土和预应力混凝土框架的拟动力地震反应研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许莉,房贞政,程浩德.普通钢筋混凝土和预应力混凝土框架的拟动力地震反应研究[J].延边大学理工学报,2009,35(1):77-81. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许莉 房贞政 程浩德 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福州大学,土木工程学院,福建,福州,350002
|
| |
| 基金项目： | 福建省教育厅科技基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对一榀钢筋混凝土扁梁框架和一榀预应力混凝土扁梁框架的拟动力试验及有限元软件分析，对它们的试验结果及地震反应进行了对比．结果表明：预应力框架结构更能满足“小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒”的设防标准，即预应力混凝土框架结构的总体抗震性能强于普通钢筋混凝土框架结构．
|
| 关 键 词： | 扁梁框架 拟动力试验 地震反应 时程分析 |
Research on Pseudo-dynamic Seis mic Response of Reinforced Concrete Flat-beam Frame and Pre-stressed Contrete Flat-beam Frame |
| |
| XU Li,FANG Zhen-zheng,CHENG Hao-de.Research on Pseudo-dynamic Seis mic Response of Reinforced Concrete Flat-beam Frame and Pre-stressed Contrete Flat-beam Frame[J].Journal of Yanbian University (Natural Science),2009,35(1):77-81. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Li FANG Zhen-zheng CHENG Hao-de |
| |
| Affiliation: | ( College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Using the pseudo-dynamic test and the finite element method with the software, we analyze the difference of the reinforced concrete flat-beam frame and the pre-stressed concrete flat-beam frame. The results show that the prestressed frame structure is better to satisy security standards： No damage after a small scale quake, repairable after a medium scale quake and no collapse in a large scale quake. Namely the pre-stressed frame structure＇s overall seismic performance is better than the reinforced concrete structure. |
| |
| Keywords: | flat-beam frame pseudo-dynamic test seismic response time history analysis |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
