Waterbody mapping: a comparison of remotely sensed and GIS open data sources

Surface water maps are essential for many environmental applications. Waterbody delineation from satellite images remains a challenging task due to sensor limitations, the presence of clouds, the low albedo surfaces in urban areas, topographic, and atmospheric conditions. In this paper, a model based on the Supported Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was adopted for waterbody extraction from Sentinel-2, Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and RapidEye satellite images. As well, the accuracy of two other sources (OpenStreetMapping (OSM) and Military Geographic Institute (MGI)) was tested. The free images from Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI were more accurate (Kappa (KHAT):0.89, 0.88) data sources than commercial RapidEye images (KHAT: 0.79). Regarding the performance between Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI, Sentinel-2 obtained the most accurate results (overall accuracy 94.49 vs. 94.17, commission error 1.34 vs. 1.87). Due to the variable spatial resolution of OSM and MGI data, it was not possible to detect small waterbodies with these sources, and therefore high values of omission error and a strong underestimation of the area of surface water were obtained. This study demonstrates the suitability of free images for mapping and monitoring of surface waterbodies, including small water bodies.