首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于四种曲线不同当量半径算法的对比研究
引用本文:茅靳丰,廖露,陈尚沅,李超峰,邓忠凯. 基于四种曲线不同当量半径算法的对比研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(4): 920-927
作者姓名:茅靳丰  廖露  陈尚沅  李超峰  邓忠凯
作者单位:解放军理工大学国防工程学院
摘    要:为探讨不同曲线代替拱形断面地下工程顶部曲线对当量半径及围护结构传热的影响趋势,利用圆弧、椭圆、抛物线和双曲线分别代替求得当量半径值的计算公式。基于MATLAB和COMSOL软件针对宽度参数L、起拱高度H和拱高h进行模拟,分析结果发现,在不考虑明显偏离情况下,3个参数对当量半径值的影响趋势总体上分别保持一致,Rdif-sRdif-p的差值在对应L、H和h的变化条件下最大分别可达0.43 m、0.45 m和0.65 m。对比发现,湿周法所得当量半径值均大于截面积法,两者差值在对应参数变化条件下最大分别可达1.03 m、0.91 m和0.94 m。且从工程最高温度的角度分析,采用截面积法计算模拟宜选择椭圆,采用湿周法则宜选择抛物线。若给定相同热流密度,则湿周法计算所得的温升大于截面积法。

关 键 词:曲线  当量半径  拱形  地下工程  影响趋势  
收稿时间:2017-12-29

Comparative Study on Different Equivalent Radius Algorithms Based on Four Curves
Mao Jinfeng,Liao Lu,Chen Shangyuan,Li Chaofeng,Deng Zhongkai. Comparative Study on Different Equivalent Radius Algorithms Based on Four Curves[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(4): 920-927
Authors:Mao Jinfeng  Liao Lu  Chen Shangyuan  Li Chaofeng  Deng Zhongkai
Abstract:In order to study the effect of different curves in place of the top curve of arch section in underground engineering on the equivalent radius and the heat-transfer of envelope, theoretical formulas of equivalent radius are obtained by using circular arc, ellipse, parabola and hyperbolic respectively. According to the simulation to the width parameter L, the springing height H and the height h of arch based on MATLAB and COMSOL, the results show that the overall impact of each parameter on the equivalent radius is consistent without considering the obvious deviation and that the biggest difference between Rdif-s and Rdif-p in the corresponding L, H and h changes can respectively reach up to 0.45 m, 0.43 m and 0.65 m. It is found by comparison that the equivalent radius of the wetted perimeter method is larger than that of the cross section method and that the biggest difference between the two methods in the corresponding L, H and h changes can respectively reach up to 1.03 m, 0.91 m and 0.94m. And from the view of the maximum temperature of engineering, ellipse and parabola should be respectively selected when using the cross section method and wetted perimeter method to simulate. Given the same heat flux, the temperature rise of the wetted perimeter method is larger than that of the cross section method.
Keywords:curve   equivalent radius   arch   underground engineering   impact trend  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地下空间与工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地下空间与工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号