首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Extended sliding frame R-Aloha: Medium access control (MAC) protocol for mobile networks
Authors:Kazi Atiqur Rahman  Kemal E Tepe
Affiliation:1. Institute of Big Data Science and Industry, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;2. School of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;3. School of Software Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;1. Studies and Research Laboratory in Applied Mathematics Mohammadia School of Engineering Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco;2. IFELAB – LERMA, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
Abstract:Proliferation of mobile communication devices necessitates a reliable and efficient medium access control (MAC) protocol. In this paper, A MAC protocol, called extended sliding frame reservation Aloha (ESFRA), based on sliding frame R-Aloha (SFRA) is proposed for network access technique. ESFRA is particularly designed to solve the mobile hidden station (MHS) problem in a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) by including relative locations of transmitting stations in the packet frame information header. The MHS problem is unique in mobile networks and occurs if a mobile station enters in a collision free zone of any ongoing communication and disturbs this communication with its transmission. In addition to the MHS problem, ESFRA simultaneously solves hidden station, exposed station, and neighborhood capture problems typically observed in wireless networks. A Markov model of ESFRA is developed and provided here to estimate throughput, delay and collision probabilities of the proposed protocol. The Markov modeling is extended to the analysis of SFRA and IEEE 802.11 to compare these competing MAC protocols with ESFRA. The analysis shows that ESFRA decreases frame transmission delay, increases throughput, and reduces collision probabilities compared to IEEE 802.11 and SFRA. ESFRA improves the network throughput 28 percent compared to that of IEEE 802.11, and 33 percent compared to that of SFRA. The improved performance is obtained at the expense of the synchronization compared to IEEE 802.11, but there is virtually no extra cost compared to SFRA.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号