首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

传统资源量估算方法在第三类矿产中的应用与对比研究——以宁夏某建筑用石灰岩矿山为例
引用本文:张鹏川.,褚小东.,曾建平,刘建兵. 传统资源量估算方法在第三类矿产中的应用与对比研究——以宁夏某建筑用石灰岩矿山为例[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(9)
作者姓名:张鹏川.  褚小东.  曾建平  刘建兵
作者单位:中国地质大学北京;宁夏地质局,中国地质大学北京;宁夏地质矿产勘查院,宁夏有色金属地质勘查院,宁夏有色金属地质勘查院
摘    要:第三类矿产资源量估算一般采用传统资源量估算方法,但是不同方法估算的结果相差较大。本文以宁夏某建筑用石灰岩矿山为例,利用AutoCAD软件建立了矿山可采范围模型并测量了资源量,通过与利用平行断面法、水平断面法和水平投影地质块段法估算的资源量结果进行对比,发现平行断面法误差最大,水平投影地质块段法次之,水平断面法最小。研究结果表明:对于矿体形态简单矿山,上述三种方法均可采用,一般宜采用平行断面法或水平投影地质块段法;对于矿体形态复杂矿山,应该优先采用水平断面法,并根据矿体形态变化,选择合适的水平断面。

关 键 词:第三类矿产  资源量估算  平行断面法  水平投影地质块段法  水平断面法
收稿时间:2016-12-24
修稿时间:2017-08-27

The application and comparison research of traditional resources estimation in the third kinds of minerals: A case study of limestone mine used in construction in Ningxia
ZHANG Pengchuan.,CHU Xiaodong.,ZENG Jianping and LIU Jianbing. The application and comparison research of traditional resources estimation in the third kinds of minerals: A case study of limestone mine used in construction in Ningxia[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2017, 26(9)
Authors:ZHANG Pengchuan.  CHU Xiaodong.  ZENG Jianping  LIU Jianbing
Affiliation:China University of Geosciences Beijing,Beijing,;Geological Bureau of Ningxia,Ningxia Yinchuan,China University of Geosciences Beijing,Beijing,;Institute of Geology and mineral resources exploration of Ningxia,Ningxia Yinchuan,geological prospecting institute of non-ferrous metal of Ningxia,geological prospecting institute of non-ferrous metal of Ningxia
Abstract:Reserve estimation of the third kinds of minerals generally use traditional reserve, but the result of estimation in different methods is lager. In this paper, take a limestone mine used in construction in Ningxia as an example. The model of recoverable mining area is established and the amount of resources is measured by AutoCAD software. The results are compared with those estimates of resources by using parallel section method, horizontal section method and horizontal projection geological block method. There is a discovery , error with parallel section method is the largest, horizontal projection geological block method is smaller, horizontal section method is the smallest. The research results show that The three methods can be used for the mine which has simple ore body . Generally, the parallel section method or horizontal projection method should adopted; the mine which has complex ore body should prefer horizontal section method. And should select appropriate level section according to ore body form varied.
Keywords:the third kinds of minerals   resources estimation   parallel section method   Horizontal projection geological block method   Horizontal section method
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国矿业》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国矿业》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号