国内外枸杞农药残留限量标准对比分析

目的 对比不同国家、地区枸杞中农药的最大残留限量(maximum residues limits, MRLs)标准, 对其差异进行分析。方法 查阅整理我国、欧盟、国际食品法典委员会(Codex Alimentarius Commission, CAC)、韩国和日本关于枸杞农药MRLs的标准, 分析我国、欧盟、CAC、韩国和日本在枸杞农药MRLs标准体系上的差异。结果 我国规定了枸杞中116种农药MRLs标准, 而欧盟、CAC、韩国、日本分别规定了498、15、53、214种标准, 我国标准与欧盟、CAC、韩国和日本的标准共同关注度分别是13.9%、11.0%、5.7%和17.4。结论 我国对比欧盟、CAC、韩国及日本的枸杞农药MRLs标准中种类及数量均存在差异，但我国标准符合我国实际国情。为了避免枸杞出口受阻, 在修订我国枸杞农药MRLs标准时, 可以参考与我国有枸杞贸易往来的其他国家、地区及组织的标准。

Comparative analysis of domestic and foreign pesticide residue limit standards for Lycium barbarum L.

Compare the maximum residue limits (MRLs) standards of pesticides in Lycium barbarum L. from different countries and regions, and the differences were analyzed. Methods Check and organize the standards of China, European Union (EU), Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), Korea and Japan on the MRLs of pesticides in Lycium barbarum L., analyzed the differences between China, EU, CAC, Korea and Japan on the standard system of MRLs of pesticides in Lycium barbarum L. Results China specifies 116 pesticide MRLs standards in Lycium barbarum L., while the EU, CAC, Korea and Japan specify 498, 15, 53 and 214 standards respectively, and the common concern of our standards with the EU, CAC, Korea and Japan is 13.9%, 11.0%, 5.7% and 17.4 respectively.. Conclusion China compared with the EU, CAC, South Korea and Japan''s MRLs standards for Lycium barbarum L. pesticides in the types and quantities are different, but our standards are consistent with the actual situation in China. In order to avoid the export of Lycium barbarum L. obstruction, in the revision of China''s pesticide MRLs standards for Lycium barbarum L., you can refer to the standards of other countries, regions and organizations that have trade with Lycium barbarum L.