首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

新食品原料食叶草的安全性评估
引用本文:楼敏涵,曲雪峰,张丽婧,刘臻,胡志航,王茵. 新食品原料食叶草的安全性评估[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(10): 3919-3926
作者姓名:楼敏涵  曲雪峰  张丽婧  刘臻  胡志航  王茵
作者单位:杭州医学院,杭州医学院,杭州医学院,杭州医学院,杭州医学院,杭州医学院
基金项目:浙江省医学支撑学科营养学(16-zc03)、浙江省中医药科技计划重点项目(2019ZZ005)
摘    要:目的 系统评估食叶草的食用安全性.方法 依据现行《新食品原料安全性审查管理办法》的规定,对食叶草开展成分分析(营养成分、可能存在的天然有毒物质)、卫生学检验(重金属、农药残留)、毒理学试验[包括急性经口毒性试验、三项遗传毒性试验(Ames试验、哺乳动物红细胞微核试验和小鼠精母细胞染色体畸变试验)、90 d经口毒性试验和...

关 键 词:食叶草  安全性评估  蛋白质  新食品原料  蒽醌
收稿时间:2021-02-06
修稿时间:2021-05-20

Safety evaluation of edible dock as a new food raw material
LOU Min-Han,QU Xue-Feng,ZHANG Li-Jing,LIU Zhen,HU Zhi-Hang,WANG Yin. Safety evaluation of edible dock as a new food raw material[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(10): 3919-3926
Authors:LOU Min-Han  QU Xue-Feng  ZHANG Li-Jing  LIU Zhen  HU Zhi-Hang  WANG Yin
Affiliation:hangzhou medical college,hangzhou medical college,hangzhou medical college,hangzhou medical college,hangzhou medical college,hangzhou medical college
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the food safety of edible dock systematically. Methods According to the current regulations of Administrative measures for safety review of new food materials, a series of study on the edible dock were performed, such as composition analysis (including nutritional composition and possible natural toxic substances), hygienic tests (heavy metals, pesticide residues), and toxicological tests [including acute oral toxicity test, three genetic toxicity tests (Ames test, mammalian red blood cell micronucleus test and mouse spermatocyte chromosome aberration test), 90 d oral toxicity test and teratogenicity test]. Combined with the population, history of consumption and the survey results of adverse reactions, the safety of leaf-eating grass as a new food raw material was comprehensively evaluated under the condition of the recommended daily intake of 50 g for adults (except pregnant women and lactating mothers). Results The edible dock was rich in protein (3.42 g/100 g) and potassium (0.489 g/100 g), and the content of crude polysaccharides and total flavonoids contained in biologically active substances was 348.9 mg/100 g and 40.67 mg/100 g, respectively. The content of anthraquinone was 1.29 mg/100 g. Assuming that the adult''s body weight was 60 kg and the recommended daily intake of edible dock was 50.0 g, the amount of anthraquinone ingested by eating edible dock was 0.011 mg/kg BW, which was far less than the no observed adverse effect level of it (31.3 mg/kg BW). The content of oxalic acid (0.32 g/100 g) was lower than that of spinach and other vegetables. The detection values of pesticides and heavy metals conformed to the provisions of China national food safety standards. The results of acute oral toxicity tests indicated that the edible dock power was actually non-toxic. The results of three genotoxicity tests were negative. The 90 d oral toxicity tests showed that the no observed adverse effect level of edible dock power was 8.0 g/kg BW, and the results of teratogenicity test showed that there was no teratogenicity on SD rats at the experimental dose. No adverse reactions were reported in the population survey of edible dock and its products. Conclusion According to the daily intake of Chinese adults (except pregnant women and lactating mothers) is not more than 50.0 g, as a new food raw material, the edible dock poses a low potential risk to the health of adults.
Keywords:Edible dock   Safety assessment   Protein   New food raw material   Anthraquinone
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号