首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于驾驶员需求转矩预测的模型预测控制能量管理
引用本文:江冬冬,李道飞,俞小莉. 基于驾驶员需求转矩预测的模型预测控制能量管理[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(7): 1325-1334. DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.07.010
作者姓名:江冬冬  李道飞  俞小莉
作者单位:浙江大学 动力机械及车辆工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310027
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2019QNA4018);浙江科技厅重点研发计划资助项目(2018C01057,2018C01058);宁波市“科技创新2025”重大专项资助项目(2018B10064,2018B10063)
摘    要:以并联式混合动力车辆为研究对象,基于驾驶员需求转矩预测,采用线性时变模型预测控制算法对对象车辆进行能量管理控制. 根据驾驶员前一段时间内的需求转矩,可以预测下一时段内驾驶员的需求转矩. 与指数函数预测方法相比,自回归模型在预测步长200步之内的预测准确度比指数函数高. 根据纵向动力学公式,可以由预测获得的需求转矩序列计算获得预测的车速序列;采用线性化处理的方法,将具有非线性特性的车辆模型转化成线性时变模型,采用线性时变模型预测控制算法进行求解;将基于驾驶员需求转矩预测的模型预测控制算法和基于规则的控制算法、工况已知的模型预测控制算法进行对比. 对比结果表明:基于驾驶员需求转矩预测的模型预测控制算法与基于规则的控制算法相比,在NEDC、UDDS和WLTC这3个标准工况下的燃油经济性均有所提高,但是与工况已知时的计算结果相比有提升的空间.

关 键 词:并联式混合动力车辆  驾驶员需求转矩预测  能量管理控制  线性时变模型预测控制  

Model predictive control energy management based ondriver demand torque prediction
Dong-dong JIANG,Dao-fei LI,Xiao-li YU. Model predictive control energy management based ondriver demand torque prediction[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2020, 54(7): 1325-1334. DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.07.010
Authors:Dong-dong JIANG  Dao-fei LI  Xiao-li YU
Abstract:The linear-time varying model predictive control was proposed for the vehicle energy management control strategy based on the driver demand torque prediction aiming at the parallel hybrid electric vehicle. The driver’s demand torque in the next period was predicted according to the driver's demand torque in the previous period. The prediction accuracy of the autoregressive model within the 200 prediction step length is higher compared with the exponential function prediction method. The predicted speed sequence can be calculated from the predicted demand torque sequence according to the longitudinal dynamic formula. Then the vehicle model with nonlinear characteristics was transformed into a linear time-varying mode. The linear time-varying model predictive control algorithm was used to solve the problem. The model predictive control algorithm based on driver demand torque prediction was compared with the rule-based control algorithm and the model predictive control algorithm with known operating conditions. The comparison results show that the fuel economy of the model predictive control algorithm based on driver demand torque prediction is better under the three standard operating conditions of NEDC, UDDS and WLTC compared with the rule-based control algorithm, but there is room for improvement compared with the results of known operating condition.
Keywords:parallel hybrid electric vehicle  demand torque prediction of driver  energy management control  linear time-varying model predictive control  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(工学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(工学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号