首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中、美规范钢筋混凝土梁斜截面受剪承载力的计算对比
引用本文:叶列平,王宇航.中、美规范钢筋混凝土梁斜截面受剪承载力的计算对比[J].长安大学学报(建筑与环境科学版),2008(1):88-95.
作者姓名:叶列平  王宇航
作者单位:清华大学土木工程系,北京100084
基金项目:教育部高等学校科技创新工程重大项目培育资金项目(704003)
摘    要:基于各国混凝土梁的斜截面抗剪试验结果,对中国《混凝土结构设计规范》(GB50010-2002)与美国ACI318M-05规范的钢筋混凝土梁斜截面受剪承载力计算方法进行了分析对比,并对最大和最小配箍率也进行了对比。结果表明,美国规范受剪承载力计算公式的保证率比中国规范大,且两国规范公式保证率的差距随配箍特征值的增大而增大。通过比较得出,中国规范受剪承裁力计算还存在一止匕不足之处.需要讲一步旁善.

关 键 词:钢筋混凝土梁  斜截面  受剪承载力  保证率  折减系数  最大配箍率  最小配箍率

Calculation and Comparison Beams Between Chinese of Shear Strength of RC and American Codes
YE Lie-ping,WANG Yu-hang.Calculation and Comparison Beams Between Chinese of Shear Strength of RC and American Codes[J].Journal of Northwestern Institute of Architectural Engineering,2008(1):88-95.
Authors:YE Lie-ping  WANG Yu-hang
Affiliation:(Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Abstract:A comparison of shear strength calculation method of RC beams was studied between Chinese Code for Design of Concrete Structures (GB 50010-2002) and American Code ACI 318M-05 based on the test results in the literatures available in China and abroad. The maximum and minimum transversal reinforcement ratios specified in both codes were also compared. The results show that the assurance percentage of shear strength of American code is more reliable than Chinese code, and the difference of assurance percentage of Chinese code and American code is greater with the stirrup amount. It is indicated that there are some unreasonable problems for shear strength calculation in Chinese code, and the modification should be further adopted.
Keywords:reinforced concrete beam  oblique section  shear strength  assurance percentage  reduction factor  maximum transversal reinforcement ratio  minimum transveral reinforcement ratio
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号