Comparative antioxidant capacities of phenolic compounds measured by various tests |
| |
Authors: | Jessica Tabart,Claire Kevers,Joë l Pincemail,Jean-Olivier Defraigne,Jacques Dommes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Liège, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Unit B22, Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liege, Belgium;2. CREDEC, Pathology Tower B23, Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liege, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | The purpose of this study was to compare the antioxidant capacities of standard compounds (phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid, and glutathione) as measured by various assays. Five methods were selected so as to span a diversity of technical approaches: TEAC (radical 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6 sulphonic acid), DPPH (radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl used to measure reducing capacity), ORAC (oxygen radical scavenging capacity), red blood cell haemolysis (protection of biological sample), and ESR (electron spin resonance for direct free radical evaluation). Most compounds showed significant differences in free radical scavenging activity according to the method used. Of the 25 tested compounds, only a few, such as myricetin and gallocatechin, gave comparable activities in the various tests. To standardise reporting on antioxidant capacity, it is proposed to use a weighted mean of the values obtained using the DPPH, ORAC, resistance to haemolysis, and ESR assays. |
| |
Keywords: | AAPH, 2,2&prime -azobis-2-methyl-propanimidamide DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity ESR, electron spin resonance ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity SOD, superoxide dismutase TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|