首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of embedded and isolated administrations of the California Psychological Inventory's Socialization subscale.
Authors:Alterman  Arthur I; McDermott  Paul A; Mulvaney  Frank D; Cacciola  John S; Rutherford  Megan J; Searles  John S; Lynch  Kevin; Cnaan  Avital
Abstract:Alternate administration methods were tested for the Socialization (So) subscale of the California Psychological Inventory (CPI; H. G. Gough, 1994; H. G. Gough & P. Bradley, 1996) in 437 young adult men. One method administered the 46 CPI-So items in isolation from the CPI, whereas the 2nd method administered the 46 items embedded in the CPI. External validity measures of antisociality were also administered over the 2 sessions. Isolated administration produced somewhat higher internal consistency and significantly better concurrent validity and demonstrated construct validity as a measure of antisociality. Additional factor analytic studies of the CPI-So and CPI revealed that the 2 CPI-So versions had different factorial structures and that the embedded CPI-So subscale did not retain factorial integrity or an appreciable amount of reliable and uniquely interpretable variance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
Keywords:California Psychological Inventory Socialization subscale  antisociality  embedded vs isolated test administration  factor analysis & structure  concurrent validity  internal consistency  reliability
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号