首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

柔性桩黏性土的非极限主动土压力
引用本文:李朝阳,谢强,康景文,赵梦怡,郭永春.柔性桩黏性土的非极限主动土压力[J].土木与环境工程学报,2018,40(5):64-70.
作者姓名:李朝阳  谢强  康景文  赵梦怡  郭永春
作者单位:西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院, 成都 610031,西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院, 成都 610031,中建西南勘察设计研究院有限公司, 成都 610000,西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院, 成都 610031,西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院, 成都 610031
基金项目:中建股份科技研发课题(CSCEC-2014-Z-48)
摘    要:以柔性桩支护的黏性土基坑边坡为研究对象,考虑桩后土拱效应、非极限状态下桩土内摩擦角和黏聚力发挥值、桩后土体内摩擦角和黏聚力发挥值的影响,从黏性土应力莫尔圆出发,采用微层分析法建立静力平衡,搜索桩后土体潜在滑动面,推导柔性桩黏性土的非极限主动土压力计算式。通过实例计算对比分析了本文计算理论与经典Rankine计算理论,本文计算方法计算得到的主动土压力大于Rankine计算值,合力作用位置高于Rankine计算值,潜在滑动面范围小于Rankine极限状态滑动面。

关 键 词:应力莫尔圆  非极限状态  主动土压力  微层分析法  土拱效应
收稿时间:2017/9/18 0:00:00

Active earth pressure of cohesive soil against flexible pile under nonlimit state
Li Zhaoyang,Xie Qiang,Kang Jingwen,Zhao Mengyi and Guo Yongchun.Active earth pressure of cohesive soil against flexible pile under nonlimit state[J].Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering,2018,40(5):64-70.
Authors:Li Zhaoyang  Xie Qiang  Kang Jingwen  Zhao Mengyi and Guo Yongchun
Affiliation:Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China,Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China,China Southwest Geotechnical Investigation & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, P. R. China,Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China and Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China
Abstract:Considering soil arching effects, the internal friction angle and cohesive force between pile and soil, between soil particles are generally under nonlimit state. Cohesive soil slope supported by flexible pile is studied and the potential slope sliding surface is searched and the formulas of the active earth pressure of cohesive soil under nonlimit state against flexible pile is derived via Mohr circle of stress, micro layer analysis method as well as the static equilibrium. The difference between the theory proposed and Rankine solution is studied via comparison with engineering applications. The active earth pressure calculated by proposed method in this paper is greater, while the location impacted by resultant force of the active earth pressure is higher. Besides, the ranse of potential sliding surface is smaller than that of sliding surface under Rankine limit state.
Keywords:mohr circle of stress  nonlimit state  active earth pressure  micro layer analysis method  soil arching effects
点击此处可从《土木与环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土木与环境工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号