首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Measurement of fracture toughness by nanoindentation methods: Recent advances and future challenges
Affiliation:1. Roma TRE University, Engineering Department, Italy;2. Department of Materials Science, TU Darmstadt, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany;3. Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA;4. Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA;1. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Physical Metallurgy, Alarich-Weiss-Str. 2, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany;2. Austrian Academy of Science, Erich-Schmid-Institute for Materials Science & Montanuniversität Leoben, Department Materials Physics, Jahnstr. 12, A-8700 Leoben, Austria;1. Michigan Technological University, College of Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Houghton, MI 49931, United States;2. Nanomechanics, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States;3. Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany;1. Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Mechanics of Materials and Nanostructures, Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, CH-3602 Thun, Switzerland;2. University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Road, OX1 3PH Oxford, United Kingdom;3. Kompetenzzentrum Automobil- und Industrie-Elektronik GmbH, Europastraße 8, A-9524 Villach, Austria;4. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Applied Materials (IAM), P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany;1. Fundació CTM Centre Tecnològic, Plaça de la Ciència 2, 08243 Manresa, Spain;2. Laboratoire de Synthèse et Fonctionnalisation des Céramiques, UMR3080 CNRS/Saint-Gobain, 84306 Cavaillon, France;3. Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, ETSEIB, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-Barcelona TECH, Avda. Diagonal 647, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;4. CRnE, Center for Research in nanoEngineering, UPC-Barcelona TECH, C/Pascual i Vila 15, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Abstract:In this paper, we describe recent advances and developments for the measurement of fracture toughness at small scales by the use of nanoindentation-based methods including techniques based on micro-cantilever, beam bending and micro-pillar splitting. A critical comparison of the techniques is made by testing a selected group of bulk and thin film materials. For pillar splitting, cohesive zone finite element simulations are used to validate a simple relationship between the critical load at failure, the pillar radius, and the fracture toughness for a range of material properties and coating/substrate combinations. The minimum pillar diameter required for nucleation and growth of a crack during indentation is also estimated. An analysis of pillar splitting for a film on a dissimilar substrate material shows that the critical load for splitting is relatively insensitive to the substrate compliance for a large range of material properties. Experimental results from a selected group of materials show good agreement between single cantilever and pillar splitting methods, while a discrepancy of ∼25% is found between the pillar splitting technique and double-cantilever testing. It is concluded that both the micro-cantilever and pillar splitting techniques are valuable methods for micro-scale assessment of fracture toughness of brittle ceramics, provided the underlying assumptions can be validated. Although the pillar splitting method has some advantages because of the simplicity of sample preparation and testing, it is not applicable to most metals because their higher toughness prevents splitting, and in this case, micro-cantilever bend testing is preferred.
Keywords:Fracture toughness  Nanoindentation  Cantilever  Pillar  Micron-scale
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号