首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

深切峡谷底斜拉桥颤振稳定性能研究
引用本文:周奇,郭震山,冯云成,任鹏杰,朱乐东.深切峡谷底斜拉桥颤振稳定性能研究[J].山东建筑大学学报,2014(2):131-136,147.
作者姓名:周奇  郭震山  冯云成  任鹏杰  朱乐东
作者单位:[1] 汕头大学风洞实验室,广东汕头515063 [2] 桥梁结构抗风技术交通行业重点实验室,上海200092 [3] 中国交通建设股份有限公司第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西西安710065 [4]同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海200092
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51308330);国家自然科学基金项目(91215302);桥梁结构抗风技术交通行业重点实验室开发项目(KLWRTBMC12-01);
摘    要:以峡谷底斜拉桥——迫龙沟大桥为工程背景,结合地形试验结果和大桥具体位置确定了桥位处的设计风参数;分别检验了小风攻角和大风攻角下颤振稳定性能,阐明了颤振临界风速随风攻角改变的变化规律;分析了颤振导数和系统阻尼的变化特征,获得了不同结构状态下主梁断面颤振驱动机理。结果表明:峡谷底桥梁的设计基准高度可参照跨中位置确定,颤振检验风速可按不同风攻角区间分别确定;颤振临界风速和颤振检验风速随风攻角的增大均呈降低趋势,但由于下降速率不同有可能出现小风攻角下颤振不失稳而大风攻角下颤振失稳的现象;不同风攻角状态下或施加气动措施前后,颤振导数和系统阻尼与折减风速的变化特征相似,表明颤振驱动机理和颤振形态均保持不变。

关 键 词:桥梁工程  颤振性能  风洞试验  颤振临界风速  颤振驱动机理

Experimental study on flutter performance of cable-stayed bridge at the bottom of a deep-cutting gorge
Affiliation:Zhou Qi, Guo Zhenshan , Feng Yuncheng , et al. ( 1. Laboratory of Wind Tunnel, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Wind Resistance Technology of Bridges of Ministry of Transport, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. China Communications construction Company Ltd. First Highway Consultants Co. Ltd. , Xian 710065, China)
Abstract:Polong Valley Bridge, located at the bottom of a deep-cutting gorge, was taken as the engineering background in this article. Firstly, the design wind parameters of the bridge site were determined based on the topographic experiment results and the bridge location. Then, the flutter stability performance of the bridge, under small and large wind attack angle, was investigated via the sectional model wind tunnel test. And the variation characteristics of the flutter critical wind speed with the attack angle changing, were also analyzed in this article. Finaly, the flutter-driving mechanism of different structure states, was studied based on the flutter derivatives and system torsional damping ratio. The results show that, the design standard height can be calculated in the reference of the elevation of mid-span, and the flutter checking wind speed should be determined in different wind attack angle regions respectively. Both the flutter critical wind speed and the flutter checking wind speed decreases with the wind attack angle increasing. However, because of different decreasing speed, there may be the phenomenon that it is stability under small wind attack angle but instability under large wind attack angle, when the bridge is under different wind attack angles or before and after setting aerodynamic mitigation measure, the flutter derivates and system damping ratio change similarly with the reduced widn speed increasing, which means that both the flutter-driving mechanisms and the flutter modality maintain the same characteristic.
Keywords:bridge engineering  flutter performance  wind tunnel test  flutter critical wind speed  flutter-driving mechanism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号