| 从网络侵权案例看“提示规则”及其完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王竹,舒星旭. 从网络侵权案例看“提示规则”及其完善[J]. 信息网络安全, 2011, 0(5): 65-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2011.05.023 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王竹 舒星旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学,四川成都,610051 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《侵权责任法》第36条第2款规定了网络侵权的＂提示规则＂。该款第1句中的＂侵权行为＂实质上是一般意义上的＂侵害行为＂,但该款第2句认定的是应当承担侵权责任的侵权行为,这就产生了网络服务提供者自我判断的空间和可能承担责任的风险。这样的规则设计实际上将网络服务提供者推入了两难境地,应该通过增设＂反提示规则＂和＂提示担保规则＂来完善。
|
| 关 键 词： | 网络服务提供者 提示规则 反提示规则 提示担保规则 |
Research On the Notice Rule for the Tort Liability of ISP and Improvement for it |
| |
| WANG zhu,SHU Xing-Xu. Research On the Notice Rule for the Tort Liability of ISP and Improvement for it[J]. Netinfo Security, 2011, 0(5): 65-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2011.05.023 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG zhu SHU Xing-Xu |
| |
| Affiliation: | WANG zhu,SHU Xing-Xu(SI CHUAN UNIVERSITY,Sichuan Chengdu 610051,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Paragraph 2 of Article 36 of Tort Liability Law stipulates the Notice Rule in internet torts.The tortious act in the first sentence of this paragraph actually means act causes damage,but the second sentence of this paragraph determines the liable tortious act.That is the reason for the space of self-determination of ISP and its risk to bear liability.This design of regulation actually put the ISP into a dilemma.It can be improved by adding Counter-notice Rule and Secured Notice Rule. |
| |
| Keywords: | ISP Notice Rule Counter-notice Rule Secured Notice Rule |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
