Effect of the compatibility on the morphology and properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber/polypropylene thermoplastic vulcanizates

In this study, the morphologies of three types of acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (NBR)/polypropylene (PP) thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) (with an NBR/PP blend ratio of 70/30) were compared. The TPVs were (1) an ultrafine fully vulcanized acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (UFNBR)/PP TPV made by the mechanical blending of UFNBR with PP, (2) a dynamically vulcanized NBR/PP TPV without the compatibilization of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MP) and amine‐terminated butadiene–acrylonitrile copolymer (ATBN), and (3) a dynamically vulcanized NBR/PP TPVs with the compatibilization of MP and ATBN. The influence of the compatibility therein on the size of the dispersed vulcanized NBR particles and the crystallization behavior of the PP in the TPVs and the resultant properties are also discussed. As indicated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, polarizing microscopy, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, and rheological and mechanical testing, the compatibility was significantly improved by the reactive compatibilization of MP and ATBN, which led to a uniform and fine morphology. The compatibilization increased the crystallization rate and reduced the size of the spherulites of PP. On the other hand, it was found that the dispersed vulcanized NBR particles lowered the degree of crystallinity. The better the compatibility of the blend was, the lower the degree of crystallinity and the storage modulus were, but the higher the loss factor and the processing viscosity were. All TPVs showed almost the same oil resistance, but the TPV prepared with reactive compatibilization had the best mechanical properties. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012