首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


tRNA Processing by Protein‐Only versus RNA‐Based RNase P: Kinetic Analysis Reveals Mechanistic Differences
Authors:Dr Liudmila V Pavlova  Dr Markus Gößringer  Christoph Weber  Aurélie Buzet  Prof Dr Walter Rossmanith  Prof Dr Roland K Hartmann
Affiliation:1. Institut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps‐Universit?t Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg (Germany);2. Zentrum für Anatomie und Zellbiologie, Medizinische Universit?t Wien, W?hringer Stra?e 13, 1090 Wien (Austria)
Abstract:In Arabidopsis thaliana, RNase P function, that is, endonucleolytic tRNA 5′‐end maturation, is carried out by three homologous polypeptides (“proteinaceous RNase P” (PRORP) 1, 2 and 3). Here we present the first kinetic analysis of these enzymes. For PRORP1, a specificity constant (kreact/Km(sto)) of 3×106 M ?1 min?1 was determined under single‐turnover conditions. We demonstrate a fundamentally different sensitivity of PRORP enzymes to an Rp‐phosphorothioate modification at the canonical cleavage site in a 5′‐precursor tRNA substrate; whereas processing by bacterial RNase P is inhibited by three orders of magnitude in the presence of this sulfur substitution and Mg2+ as the metal‐ion cofactor, the PRORP enzymes are affected by not more than a factor of five under the same conditions, without significantly increased miscleavage. These findings indicate that the catalytic mechanism utilized by proteinaceous RNase P is different from that of RNA‐based bacterial RNase P, taking place without a direct metal‐ion coordination to the (pro‐)Rp substituent. As Rp‐phosphorothioate and inosine modification at all 26 G residues of the tRNA body had only minor effects on processing by PRORP, we conclude that productive PRORP–substrate interaction is not critically dependent on any of the affected (pro‐)Rp oxygens or guanosine 2‐amino groups.
Keywords:catalytic mechanisms  kinetics  PRORP  proteinaceous RNase P  Rp‐phosphorothioate modifications
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号