The interaction of drill and practice and error training with individual differences |
| |
Authors: | Annette Kluge Sandrina Ritzmann Dina Burkolter Jürgen Sauer |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Business and Organizational Psychology,University of Duisburg-Essen,Duisburg,Germany;2.Research Institute for Organizational Psychology,University of St. Gallen,St. Gallen,Switzerland;3.Department of Psychology,University of Fribourg,Fribourg,Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | This article examines the question of whether the effectiveness of training methods in vocational training settings is modified
by trainee characteristics. General mental abilities, cognitive style and conscientiousness were measured as person variables
that were expected to influence the effectiveness of training methods. Being trained on a simulated process control environment
as an example for a complex technological task for 5 h, N = 38 participants received either drill & practice (D&P) or error training (ET) as two distinct training methods. A 70-minute
transfer test followed 9 weeks later, in which the trainees had to manage familiar (near transfer) as well as unfamiliar fault
states (far transfer). The results showed that high-ability trainees benefited more from D&P than from ET, whereas low-ability
trainees benefited equally well from either training method. Furthermore, participants with a highly flexible cognitive style
benefited more from D&P rather than ET. Also participants low in conscientiousness profited more from D&P. The findings are
indicative of the tentative benefits of using learner-tailored training methods, suggesting that this person-centered approach
is worthy of further exploration. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|