首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Air separation by pressure swing adsorption
Affiliation:1. Programa deTecnologia de Processos Químicos e Bioquímicos, Escola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;2. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;3. Petrobras, CENPES, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;1. Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering, Associate Laboratory LSRE/LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal;2. Department of Automation and Hydraulics Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box, FI-33720 Tampere, Finland;1. School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, PR China;2. Beijing Higher Institution Engineering Research Center of Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection, Beijing 100083, PR China;3. College of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, PR China;4. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2136, United States
Abstract:The original pressure swing air separation process, developed almost simultaneously by Exxon and Air Liquide, uses a nitrogen selective zeolite adsorbent to produce a high purity oxygen product. The same basic process is still widely used in small scale units although, for larger scale units, many modifications to the cycle have been introduced in order to reduce power consumption. Although nitrogen can in principle be recovered from the blowdown stream of such systems, if high purity nitrogen is the required product, it is more economic to use an oxygen selective adsorbent. Most adsorbents show either no selectivity or preferential adsorption of nitrogen. However, in small pore carbon molecular sieves or 4A zeolite there is a substantial difference in diffusion rates so that an efficient kinetic separation is possible. Somewhat different cycles are generally used in such processes. Progress in modelling the dynamic behaviour of both types of PSA system is reviewed and comparisons between experimental performance and the model predictions are shown. A simple linear driving force model provides a good overall prediction of the effects of process variables but the computationally more cumbersome diffusion model gives better quantitative agreement with experiment. Comparisons are drawn between the performance achieved (in nitrogen production) with two different kinetically selective adsorbents; RS-10 (a modified 4A zeolite) and Bergbau Forschung carbon molecular sieve.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号