Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure

Two principal methods of determining the conformation of shortpieces of polypeptide backbone in proteins have been developed:using a database of known structures and systematicallygeneratingall conformations. In this paper, we compare the effectivenessof these two techniques. The completeness of the database forsegments of different lengths is examined and it is found tocontain most conformations for segments seven residues long,but to deteriorate rapidly for longer regions. When the databasesegment is to be incorporated into the rest of a structure,at least seven residues are required to build four new residues,because of the need to positionthe segment relative to the restof the structure.It is found that such positioning using flankingresidues results in large errors in the inserted region. Weconclude that the database method is currently not effectivefor comparative modeling, even for short segments. The systematicsearchprocedure is found to generate almost all structures of shortsegments found in proteinsIn contrast to the database method,low root mean square error structures are obtained for a setof trial segments embedded in the rest of a protein structure.Thus, it should be considered the method of choice.