"Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis in clinical psychology programs and the internship match": Correction to Neimeyer, Rice, and Keilin (2007).

Reports an error in "Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis in clinical psychology programs and the internship match" by Greg J. Neimeyer, Kenneth G. Rice and W. Gregory Keilin (Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2007[Aug], Vol 1[3], 153-162). The biography for the third author was incorrect. It should read as follows: GREGORY KEILIN is an Assistant Director at the Counseling and Mental Health Center at the University of Texas at Austin and a former Chair of APPIC. He received his doctorate in Counseling Psychology from Colorado State University. His current research interests include supply and demand issues in professional psychology. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2007-12635-001.) Academic training programs in clinical psychology vary in the emphasis that they place on science and practice, and this paper examines whether these differential emphases are linked to distinctive internship outcomes. In a study of 2,130 internship applicants from clinical psychology programs, differences were noted among practice-oriented programs, balanced science-practice programs, and science-oriented programs. Against a backdrop of some similarities, a differential emphasis on science and practice within academic training programs was related to significantly different internship match rates, as well as to successful matching in qualitatively different internship settings. Results provided qualified support for future work that might further address the relationship between academic training programs and outcomes in the field of clinical psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)