| Abstract: | Most drugs induce conditioned taste aversions and are therefore commonly supposed to produce nausea and sickness. Paradoxically, some drugs appear to lose induction capability when made to serve as a cue for a 2nd drug that produces more severe sickness, perhaps through selective association with a hypothetical homeostatic or antisickness aftereffect of sickness. Using drug–drug pairings has made antisickness conditioning theory difficult to validate. Rotation serves in lieu of a drug cue in rats. Rotation–drug pairings eliminate drug interactions and enable the sorts of parametric manipulations required to validate the theory. By postulating a common sickness mechanism to explain both taste aversion and aversion failure, the theory places the phenomenon within an adaptive evolutionary framework. Successful application could yield a direct countermeasure to severe nausea in clinical settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
