Comparison of serological tests for the detection of antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae in rheumatological patients

In cases of reactive arthritis, a suspected Chlamydia trachomatis infection is often detected by serological methods. However, mostly tests with genus-specific antigens are used, neglecting the fact that antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae are highly prevalent in the adult population. Therefore we tested sera of 129 patients with various rheumatological disorders and of 18 healthy persons in parallel with a genus-specific test (IPAZYME) and with the species-specific microimmunofluorescence test for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae antibodies. The data showed that 55% of the 64 IPA-positive results were caused by antibodies (IgG) against Chlamydia pneumoniae, only 6% by anti-Chlamydia trachomatis IgG and 20% by both specificities. For IgA antibodies, the percentages were 44%, 12.5% and 12.5% respectively. In 12 IPA-positive cases, the MIF showed no reaction. 58% of all 147 sera tested with MIF had IgG antibodies against C. pneumoniae, 5% had anti-C. trachomatis IgG and 8% IgG against both species. The percentages for IgA were 29%, 2% and 2%, respectively. IgM positivity in MIF disappeared after absorption with rheumatoid factor absorbent. No significant differences were found between the various groups of patients. The data suggest that due to the high prevalence of anti-C. pneumoniae antibody, genus-species tests cannot be used as screening tests for the serological diagnosis of C. trachomatis infections.