Effect of fertilizer type,sampling depth,and years on Colwell soil test phosphorus for phosphorus leaching soils

The relationships between (i) soil test phosphorus (P) (Colwell sodium bicarbonate procedure) and the level of P applied (from 0 to 1000 kg total P ha^–1) (relationship 1), and (ii) yield and soil-test P (relationship 2, the soil P test calibration), were measured in two field experiments on very sandy, P-leaching soils in the high rainfall (> 800 mm annual average) areas of south-western Australia. The soils were humic sandy podzols, or haplohumods, comprising 97% sand (20 to 2000 m). The experiments started in April 1984 and were terminated at the end of 1990. Soil-test P, measured on soil samples collected to 5, 10 and 25 cm depth each January in the years after P application, was related to yields of dried clover (Trifolium subterraneum) herbage measured later in each year. The four P fertilizers studied were single superphosphate, coastal superphosphate (made by adding, just before granulation, extra rock phosphate together with elemental sulphur while manufacturing single superphosphate), apatite rock phosphate, and Calciphos.Relationship (1) was adequately described by a linear equation (R² > 0.80, most being > 0.90). The slope coefficient estimates the extractability of P from the soil by the Colwell procedure, and is called extractability. Relationship (2) was adequately described by the Mitscherlich equation (R² > 0.75, most being > 0.90). For relationship (2), use of percentage of the maximum (relative) yield eliminated differences due to different maximum yields and yield responses (maximum yield minus the yield for the nil-P treatment). Soil test P ranged from about 4 to 150 g Pg^–1 soil. Soil test P and extractability were generally higher for samples of the top 5 cm of the soil than the top 25 cm, and were largest for single superphosphate and lowest for apatite rock phosphate. Both extractability (relationship (1)) and the curvature coefficient of the Mitscherlich equation (relationship (2)), differed for different P fertilizers and different soil sample depths. The curvature coefficient also differed for different yield assessments (harvests) in the same or different years. Different soil P test calibrations were required for different P fertilizers, soil sample depths and harvest in the same or different years. It is concluded that soil P testing provides a crude estimate of the current P status of P-leaching soils in Western Australia.