| 循环流化床脱硫和煤粉炉烟气湿法脱硫的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梁礼信,张志正.循环流化床脱硫和煤粉炉烟气湿法脱硫的比较[J].广东电力,2003,16(5):29-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梁礼信 张志正 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东省电力设计研究院,广东,广州,510600 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 循环流化床（CFB）锅炉脱硫和煤粉炉烟气湿法脱硫都是目前应用于大型燃煤电厂工程的主要脱硫方式，为此，以新建燃煤电厂为例，分析循环流化床（CFB）锅炉脱硫和煤粉炉烟气湿法脱硫的特点并进行技术经济的综合比较，强调锅炉选型时应注意的事项。
|
| 关 键 词： | 循环流化床锅炉 煤粉锅炉 烟气脱硫 石灰石湿法 二氧化硫 大型燃煤电厂 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-290X(2003)05-0029-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年2月1日 |
A comparison between CFB boiler desulphurization and wet flue gas desulphurization for pulverized coal fired boilers |
| |
| LIANG Li-xin,ZHANG Zhi-zheng.A comparison between CFB boiler desulphurization and wet flue gas desulphurization for pulverized coal fired boilers[J].Guangdong Electric Power,2003,16(5):29-32. |
| |
| Authors: | LIANG Li-xin ZHANG Zhi-zheng |
| |
| Abstract: | Desulphurization by circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers and wet flue gas desulphurization (FGD) for pulverized coal fired boilers are the two major desulphurization modes for large coal-fueled power plants. Citing a new-built plant for instance,this paper analyzes the features of these two modes and makes a comprehensive techno-economic comparison between them. Matters needing attention in the type selection of boilers are stressed as well. |
| |
| Keywords: | CFB FGD techno-economic analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
