首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Robust processing techniques for voice conversion
Authors:Oytun Turk  Levent M Arslan  
Affiliation:aElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Bogazici University, Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey;bR&D Department, Sestek Inc., ITU Ayazaga Kampusu, ARI-1 Teknopark Binasi, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract:Differences in speaker characteristics, recording conditions, and signal processing algorithms affect output quality in voice conversion systems. This study focuses on formulating robust techniques for a codebook mapping based voice conversion algorithm. Three different methods are used to improve voice conversion performance: confidence measures, pre-emphasis, and spectral equalization. Analysis is performed for each method and the implementation details are discussed. The first method employs confidence measures in the training stage to eliminate problematic pairs of source and target speech units that might result from possible misalignments, speaking style differences or pronunciation variations. Four confidence measures are developed based on the spectral distance, fundamental frequency (f0) distance, energy distance, and duration distance between the source and target speech units. The second method focuses on the importance of pre-emphasis in line-spectral frequency (LSF) based vocal tract modeling and transformation. The last method, spectral equalization, is aimed at reducing the differences in the source and target long-term spectra when the source and target recording conditions are significantly different. The voice conversion algorithm that employs the proposed techniques is compared with the baseline voice conversion algorithm with objective tests as well as three subjective listening tests. First, similarity to the target voice is evaluated in a subjective listening test and it is shown that the proposed algorithm improves similarity to the target voice by 23.0%. An ABX test is performed and the proposed algorithm is preferred over the baseline algorithm by 76.4%. In the third test, the two algorithms are compared in terms of the subjective quality of the voice conversion output. The proposed algorithm improves the subjective output quality by 46.8% in terms of mean opinion score (MOS).
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号