首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Supplemental water releases for fisheries restoration in a Brazilian floodplain river: a conceptual model
Authors:Alexandre L Godinho  Boyd Kynard  Carlos B Martinez
Affiliation:1. Graduate Program in Wildlife and Fisheries Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003, USAFish Passage Center, Federal University of Minas Gerais, 31270‐901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.;2. U. S. Geological Survey, Leetown Science Center, S. O. Conte Anadromous Fish Research Center, Turners Falls, MA, USA;3. Fish Passage Center, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Abstract:Highly productive floodplain rivers in Brazil and elsewhere provide livelihood and recreational fishing for millions of people around the world, but damming and controlled water discharge are a threat to these valuable ecosystems. Supplemental water releases (SWRs) at a dam are increasingly used for restoring fisheries productivity in many floodplain rivers. We proposed a conceptual model for a hypothetical water release to enhance fisheries using Três Marias Reservoir (TMR) on the São Francisco River (SFR), Brazil. The information needed by the model follows: (i) Biologically, what is the best release date? (ii) How much water will be released? (iii) What is the pattern of impoundment and how much impounded water will be released? (iv) What is the lost revenue to the power plant associated with SWR? (v) What is the relationship between river discharge and the area of floodplain that is flooded? (vi) What is the relationship between SWR and fisheries value? Ichthyoplankton studies in the SFR showed a clear positive relationship between fish density and water level (WL). While the relationship between WL and floodplain area flooded and recruitment is not known, we concluded the best date for release is when there is a natural flood, which naturally triggers fish spawning and the SWR will add to the natural flood and cover a greater floodplain area. The released volume will range from 0.302 km3 to 2.192 km3, depending on SWR duration. In most years from 1976 to 2003, TMR impounded enough water for SWR only in the second half of the fish‐spawning season (January–March). Lost revenue at TMR depended on release volume and ranged from US$ 0.493 million to US$ 3.452 million for the actual power rate. However, SWR could increase commercial fisheries income an estimated US$ 4.468 million. We forecast that SWR can bring fisheries benefits that surpass the lost revenue. Published in 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:hydroelectric dam effects  floods  fisheries restoration  floodplain restoration  fish spawning  ichthyoplankton drift
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号