Skovholt, Stone, and Hill's (1984) "Institutional affiliations of contributors to scholarly and professional activities in counseling psychology: 1980–1983": A critique.

Contends that, in the study by T. M. Skovholt et al (see record 1984-29784-001), in which they analyzed professional and scholarly contributions to counseling psychology according to institutional affiliation, a method was used that resulted in some programs being ranked higher and other programs being ranked lower than they might have been had all the data been used in generating the rankings. Alternate rankings are presented with a caution to future scholars to carefully consider the methods they use for these ratings and to present full data so that readers know all the limitations of the analysis. (1 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)