首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种地震道反演方法的比较
引用本文:钱勇先,游俊.两种地震道反演方法的比较[J].石油天然气学报,1994(Z1).
作者姓名:钱勇先  游俊
作者单位:江汉石油学院地球物理勘探系
摘    要:对地震道积分法和沃尔什(Walsh)函数相对层速度反演法,从方法、处理结果和地震解释等方面进行了比较和分析,并用这两种方法处理了层状模型数据和实际地震资料.结果表明:沃尔什函数相对展速度反演技术和地震道积分技术是两种值得推广的地震资料处理技术;沃尔什函数相对层速度反演技术不仅具有地震道积分技术的优点.而且还具有追踪井间薄地层、高精度计算储层厚度和孔隙度、与油气预测技术相结合计算区块的油气地质储量等特殊用途.

关 键 词:地震解释  地震数据处理  反演  道积分  沃尔什函数

Comparision of Two Seismic Trace Inversion Methods
Qian Yongxian, You Jun.Comparision of Two Seismic Trace Inversion Methods[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,1994(Z1).
Authors:Qian Yongxian  You Jun
Abstract:The trace integral method and the relative interval velocity inversion using Walsh function are theoretically comparied. Model and field seismic data are processed using these two methods. The results show that both methods are useful in seismic interpretation and that the relative interval velocity inversion has not only the same advantages as the trace integral method, but also some special uses such as tracing thin layers, calculating the thickness and the porosity of reservoir, and estimating oil/gas reserve volume of reservoir combining with oil/gas prediction techniques.
Keywords:seismic interpretation  seismic data processing  inversion  trace integral  Walsh function
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号