首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

指挥防护工程选址方案评价模型
引用本文:邱国庆,王多点,戴婷婷,隆雨清.指挥防护工程选址方案评价模型[J].计算机应用,2011,31(4):1138-1140.
作者姓名:邱国庆  王多点  戴婷婷  隆雨清
作者单位:1. 解放军理工大学 工程兵工程学院,南京 2100072. 解放军第66081部队,河北 怀来 0500833. 中国卫星海上测控部, 江苏 江阴 214431
摘    要:根据指挥防护工程选址复杂性的特点,建立适合指挥防护工程选址的模型。采用改进的层次分析法(AHP)初步确定评价指标的权重,并用熵值法进行修正。根据指挥防护工程选址评价指标的特点,采用GIS空间分析和专家群决策相结合的方法获取空间和非空间指标值。利用灰色关联度分析(GCA)对理想解法(TOPSIS)进行改进,避免了传统TOPSIS单独采用欧氏距离的局限性。算例证明,该评价模型能得到理想的评价结果。

关 键 词:指挥防护工程    选址    辅助决策    综合评价    理想解法
收稿时间:2010-08-18
修稿时间:2010-11-03

Evaluation model for selection scheme of command protection engineering site
QIU Guo-qing,WANG Duo-dian,DAI Ting-ting,LONG Yu-qing.Evaluation model for selection scheme of command protection engineering site[J].journal of Computer Applications,2011,31(4):1138-1140.
Authors:QIU Guo-qing  WANG Duo-dian  DAI Ting-ting  LONG Yu-qing
Affiliation:1. Engineering Institute of Corps of Engineers, PLA Uniersity of Science and Technology, Nanjing Jiangsu 210007,China2. Unit 66081 of PLA, Huailai Hebei 050083,China3. China Satellite Maritime Tracking and Controlling Department,Jiangyin Jiangsu 214431,China
Abstract:The model, which is available to Command Protection Engineering (CPE) site selection, was built taking the complex characteristics into consideration. The weight of evaluation index was determined by improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and was modified by entropy method. According to the characteristic of the evaluation index of CPE site selection, the combined method of the spatial information analysis and multi-expert group decision was adopted to achieve spatial and non-spatial index value. Grey Correlation Analysis (GCA) was used to improve Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), avoided the limitation that traditional TOPSIS adopts Euclidean distance alone. This model can achieve an ideal evaluation result through an example.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《计算机应用》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《计算机应用》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号