首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Adoption of machine learning technology for failure prediction in industrial maintenance: A systematic review
Affiliation:1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India;2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Institute of Scince and Technology, Kattankulathur, India;3. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kalasalingam University, India;4. Nelcast Limited, Chennai, India;1. Volvo Group Trucks Technology, Advanced Technology & Research, Göteborg, Sweden;2. Center for Applied Intelligent Systems Research, Halmstad University, Sweden;1. Bharti School of Telecommunication Technology & Management, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India;2. Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India;3. Operation & Information Management Department, School of Business, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Abstract:Failure prediction is the task of forecasting whether a material system of interest will fail at a specific point of time in the future. This task attains significance for strategies of industrial maintenance, such as predictive maintenance. For solving the prediction task, machine learning (ML) technology is increasingly being used, and the literature provides evidence for the effectiveness of ML-based prediction models. However, the state of recent research and the lessons learned are not well documented. Therefore, the objective of this review is to assess the adoption of ML technology for failure prediction in industrial maintenance and synthesize the reported results. We conducted a systematic search for experimental studies in peer-reviewed outlets published from 2012 to 2020. We screened a total of 1,024 articles, of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. We focused on understanding the datasets analyzed, the preprocessing to generate features, and the training and evaluation of prediction models. The results reveal (1) a broad range of systems and domains addressed, (2) the adoption of up-to-date approaches to preprocessing and training, (3) some lack of performance evaluation mitigating the overfitting problem, and (4) considerable heterogeneity in the reporting of experimental designs and results. We identify opportunities for future research and suggest ways to facilitate the comparison and integration of evidence obtained from single studies.
Keywords:Failure prediction  Fault prediction  Machine learning  Predictive maintenance  Systematic review
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号