| Abstract: | Tested the validity of the egotism model of human helplessness (HE). In contrast to the original theoretical approach of M. E. P. Seligman (1975) and his associates, which points to response–outcome noncontingency as the main source of HE, the egotism alternative proposes that repeated failure itself is the critical determinant of HE symptoms. Repeated failure threatens the self-esteem of the S, who supposedly engages in a least-effort strategy during the test phase of a typical learned HE study, which results in performance impairment. To examine the egotism explanation, we gave Ss noncontingent-feedback training with or without repeated failure on 5 consecutive discrimination problems. In 2 experiments, noncontingent-feedback preexposure produced HE deficits in performance on avoidance learning, whereas repeated failure appeared irrelevant to HE. This and our other findings from research are inconsistent with the egotism explanation and support instead Seligman's original proposal, in which HE is attributed to prolonged experience with noncontingency. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
