首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

三种足(鞋)底压力测量方法的比较
引用本文:张先熠,李波,唐雨然,李悦. 三种足(鞋)底压力测量方法的比较[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2012, 22(2): 72-76
作者姓名:张先熠  李波  唐雨然  李悦
作者单位:四川大学制革清洁技术国家工程实验室,四川成都,610065
摘    要:通过分析比较三种足(鞋)底压力测量结果,探究三种测量方法间相互关系.用Footscan压力板与Novel鞋垫系统测量20名大学生裸足及穿板鞋行走时“足-地”界面、“足-鞋”界面及“鞋-地”界面的压力参数,比较三个界面在足部7个分区的峰值压力、接触面积、峰值压强及冲量.结果显示三个界面的压力参数差异较大,三种测量方法不能互相替代,鞋对足部压力影响较大.

关 键 词:“足-地”界面  “足-鞋”界面  “鞋-地”界面  峰值压力

A Comparison of Three Different Plantar (sole) -pressure Measurement Methods
ZHANG Xian-yi , LI Bo , TANGg Yu-ran , LI Yue. A Comparison of Three Different Plantar (sole) -pressure Measurement Methods[J]. Leather Science and Engineering, 2012, 22(2): 72-76
Authors:ZHANG Xian-yi    LI Bo    TANGg Yu-ran    LI Yue
Affiliation:(National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)
Abstract:This study compared three plantar(sole)-pressure measurements to investigate the relationship between three methods."Shoe-ground" interface,"foot-shoe"interface and "foot-ground" interface pressure measurements using Footscan Force Plate and Novel Pedar-X system were taken for each of the 20 undergraduates.Each foot was separated in seven regions for further analysis.The parameters researched include peak force,contact area,peak pressure and impulse.The results showed that the data collected by three methods were different from each other;three methods could not be used interchangeably and shoes had a great impact on foot pressure.
Keywords:"  foot-ground"   interface  "  foot-shoe"   interface  "  shoe-ground"   interface  peak force
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号