A comparison of the thermoformability of a PPE/PP blend with thermoformable ABS. Part I: Small deformation methods

Different factors important in ascertaining the thermoformability of polymeric materials are identified and defined. These include resistance to sag, ease of flow, mold replication, deep draw capability, sensitivity to thermoforming temperature and speed, uniformity of thickness distribution, and post‐forming shrinkage and dimensional stability. Methods to study these properties can be classified into small deformation and large deformation methods. The small deformation methods, which are the subject of this paper, include dynamic temperature sweep tests, dynamic frequency sweep tests, stress relaxation time, and creep recovery tests. These tests were used to compare the thermoformabilities of a blend of polyphenylene ether (PPE) and polypropylene (PP) and thermoformable acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) resin. The dynamic temperature and frequency tests showed that the PPE/PP blend generally has a better viscoelastic balance than ABS implying a better balance between resistance to sag and ease of flow. Creep recovery tests suggested that the PPE/PP blend may offer better mold replication during thermoforming. Studies based on the stress relaxation time showed a lower residual stress build‐up in thermoformed PPE/PP blend than ABS implying better dimensional stability and a higher in‐service temperature window for the thermoformed PPE/PP blend than ABS. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1369–1376, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers