| 直读光谱与电感耦合等离子体发射光谱测定不锈钢中硅、锰、磷、铬、镍的方法比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许丹,蔡寒梅,韩蔚,李曼,陈慧娟,刘丽娜,程紫辉. 直读光谱与电感耦合等离子体发射光谱测定不锈钢中硅、锰、磷、铬、镍的方法比较[J]. 中国建材科技, 2023, 32(5): 72-74 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许丹 蔡寒梅 韩蔚 李曼 陈慧娟 刘丽娜 程紫辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国国检测试控股集团股份有限公司;国标（北京）检验认证有限公司 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对比试验，从样品前处理、测定结果等方面对直读光谱法（OES）与电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法（ICP-OES）进行分析。结果表明，两种方法无显著差异，OES的前处理更简单，检测速度更快，但对样品大小、形状要求较高，无法对直径过小的钢铁样品进行检测，而ICP-OES更符合对不同形状钢铁的检测需求。
|
| 关 键 词： | 钢铁；火花放电直读光谱法；电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法 |
Comparison of OES and ICP-OES for determination of Si, Mn, P, Cr and Ni in stainless steel |
| |
| XU Dan,CAI Hanmei,HAN Wei,LI Man,CHEN Huijuan,LIU Lin,CHENG Zihui. Comparison of OES and ICP-OES for determination of Si, Mn, P, Cr and Ni in stainless steel[J]. China Building Materials Science & Technology, 2023, 32(5): 72-74 |
| |
| Authors: | XU Dan CAI Hanmei HAN Wei LI Man CHEN Huijuan LIU Lin CHENG Zihui |
| |
| Affiliation: | China Testing & Certification international Group Co., Ltd.; Guobiao (Beijing) Testing & Certification Co., Ltd. |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper, OES and ICP-OES methods are analyzed from the aspects of sample pretreatment and determination results. The results show that there is no significant difference between the two methods. OES has simpler pretreatment and faster detection speed, but has higher requirements for the size and shape of sample, making it impossible to detect the steel sample with too small diameter. And ICP-OES is more suitable for the detection of steel with different shapes. |
| |
| Keywords: | steel OES ICP-OES |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国建材科技》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国建材科技》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
