首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

沙漠沙的筛分粒径与粒径计粒径的比较实验
引用本文:吴世亮,倪晋仁,李振山.沙漠沙的筛分粒径与粒径计粒径的比较实验[J].泥沙研究,2002(1):60-65.
作者姓名:吴世亮  倪晋仁  李振山
作者单位:北京大学环境科学中心,北京,100871,水沙科学教育部重点实验室.北京,100871
基金项目:国家自然科学基金 ( 4 96 2 5 10 1)的资助
摘    要:筛分法与粒径计法是两种重要的颗粒分析方法。本文通过较为系统的实验发现采用这两种方法所得到的实验结果之间存在较大的偏差。采用粒径计法测得的样品粒径较之用筛分法所得的结果明显偏大 ,说明用这两种原理不同的颗分方法所测出的粒径数据不能不加换算地直接采用。由于目前有关筛分粒径与粒径计粒径转换关系的研究结果并不一致 ,所以文中比较了几家代表性研究成果之间的差异 ,重点讨论了采用不同沉降速度公式进行计算时所得粒径计粒径之间的差异 ,探讨了各家结果不同的原因 ,对与颗粒粒径相关的研究具有参考价值

关 键 词:颗粒分析  筛分粒径  粒径计粒径  筛分法  粒径计法
文章编号:0468-155X(2002)01-0060-06
修稿时间:2000年7月17日

Comparison of Desert Sand Particle Sizes Obtained from Sieving and Settling Approaches
WU Shi\|liang,NI Jin\|ren,LI Zhen\|shan.Comparison of Desert Sand Particle Sizes Obtained from Sieving and Settling Approaches[J].Journal of Sediment Research,2002(1):60-65.
Authors:WU Shi\|liang  NI Jin\|ren  LI Zhen\|shan
Abstract:Sieving and settling analyses for sediment particle size are primary approaches widely used in engineering practice. In order to compare the particle sizes obtained from the two different approaches, a series of experiments were conducted for sediment samples ranged from 0.062mm to 2.0mm. The results show that the particle diameters from settling analysis are apparently greater than those from sieving analysis. The former is subject to change while different settling-velocity formulas are used for calibration. Revising relation between particle diameters in terms of sieving and settling analyses were established. In addition, the differences were found among the existing results from different investigators owing to various influencing factors such as analysis approach, experimental equipment, the formula of settling velocity used to calculate the particle diameter, the range of the particle size, and so on.
Keywords:particle\|size analysis  sieving approach  settling approach  particle diameter measured by sieve  particle diameter measured by settling tube
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号