首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

TDCR液闪分析仪Hidex300SL和SIM-MAX LSA3000在 β 核素测量中的性能比较
引用本文:张辉,杨永刚,马彦,戴雄新.TDCR液闪分析仪Hidex300SL和SIM-MAX LSA3000在 β 核素测量中的性能比较[J].辐射防护,2021,41(2):105-111.
作者姓名:张辉  杨永刚  马彦  戴雄新
作者单位:中国辐射防护研究院, 太原 030006
摘    要:本实验通过对不同活度样品的测量比较了两台TDCR液闪分析仪(Hidex 300SL和SIM-MAX LSA3000)在性能上的差异。结果表明:SIM-MAX LSA3000的本底和最小可探测活度更低,在低活度样品的测量上占有优势;用TDCR淬灭校正法对常规活度样品进行测量,两台液闪分析仪测量误差都小于1.5%,不确定度(k=2)小于2%,准确性均良好。对于计数率大于1×105 cpm的高活度的样品,两台液闪分析仪的测量结果均偏大,但SIM-MAX LSA3000偏大更加明显。

关 键 词:TDCR  Hidex300SL  SIM-MAX  LSA3000  液闪分析
收稿时间:2020-06-16

Comparison of TDCR liquid scintillation analysis counters Hidex 300SL and SIM-MAX LSA3000 in the measurement ofβ-nuclides
ZHANG Hui,YANG Yonggang,MA Yan,DAI Xiongxin.Comparison of TDCR liquid scintillation analysis counters Hidex 300SL and SIM-MAX LSA3000 in the measurement ofβ-nuclides[J].Radiation Protection,2021,41(2):105-111.
Authors:ZHANG Hui  YANG Yonggang  MA Yan  DAI Xiongxin
Affiliation:China Institute for Radiation Protection,Taiyuan 030006
Abstract:In this experiment,the performance differences of two TDCR liquid scintillation analyzers were compared by measuring the samples with different activities.The results show that the background and minimum detectable activity of SIM-MAX LSA3000 are lower,and the measurement of low activity samples is superior than that of Hidex 300SL.The TDCR quenching and correcting method was used to measure the conventional activity samples.The accuracy of the two liquid scintillation analyzers was good,the error was less than 1.5%,and the uncertainty(k=2)was less than 2%.For the high activity samples whose counting rate is more than 1×105 cpm,the results of the two liquid scintillation analyzers are larger than the real data,especially the SIM-MAX LSA3000.
Keywords:TDCR  Hidex 300SL  SIM-MAX LSA3000  liquid scintillation analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《辐射防护》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《辐射防护》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号