首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Constructed Compound Channel River Restoration Project on an Incised Stream
Authors:Michael L MacWilliams  Jr  Mark R Tompkins  Robert L Street  G Mathias Kondolf  Peter K Kitanidis
Affiliation:1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305 (corresponding author). E-mail: michael@rivermodeling.com
2Principal Engineering Geomorphologist, New Fields River Basin Services, LLC, 1668 Capistrano Ave., Berkeley, CA 94707. E-mail: mtompkins@newfields.com
3Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: street@stanford.edu
4Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Univ. of California, 202 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA. E-mail: kondolf@berkeley.edu
5Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: peterk@stanford.edu
Abstract:Compound channels are often constructed in restoration projects on rivers and streams that have been channelized or are deeply incised. This design allows for flow over a wider cross-sectional area during high flows and is expected to reduce both flow velocities and bed-shear stresses in the channel during high flows. Using a compound channel restoration project on Tassajara Creek as a case study, the effectiveness of a constructed compound channel in reducing channel velocities and bed-shear stresses during high flow events was tested in two ways. First, since this is an a posteriori analysis, postproject surveys and assessments of the project are used to demonstrate the geomorphic and ecological benefits of the constructed compound channel for reducing further channel incision, improving channel stability, and enhancing native riparian vegetation, while still providing conveyance capacity for design flood flows. Second, the effectiveness of a constructed compound channel in reducing channel velocities and bed-shear stresses during high flow events is evaluated using both the one-dimensional (1D) model, HEC-RAS, and the three-dimensional (3D) numerical model, UnTRIM. This analysis demonstrates that the 1D analysis does not accurately portray the benefits of the compound channel, and is therefore not a suitable tool for evaluating the effectiveness of compound channel designs. These results demonstrate the advantages of using a 3D model and make a strong case for the implementation of more detailed hydrodynamic modeling in evaluating the suitability of restoration alternatives to improve the planning and design of river restoration projects.
Keywords:Rivers  Restoration  Channels  Numerical models  Rivers  Hydrodynamics  Channel flow  Design  California  
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号