A patient's perspective on the management of peptic esophageal stricture: experience and results in 113 consecutive cases

A retrospective analysis of 113 consecutive cases of benign esophageal stricture, all secondary to gastroesophageal reflux, 100 treated conservatively, 13 treated surgically, has been carried out in conjunction with a postal questionnaire of patients. Patients were requested to grade both their swallowing ability and the acceptability of their treatment. Of those responding to questionnaire, 88% of patients treated conservatively found their treatment acceptable or better, and 72% were left with either no or minimal restriction of diet. There was no correlation between either the total number or frequency of dilatations and the result achieved. Similarly, patient satisfaction appears largely independent of these variables. Doctors should be wary of taking recurrence of a stricture after initial dilatation as indicating a poor eventual outcome or a dissatisfied patient. There was no difference in terms of either the result or patient satisfaction between conservatively treated and surgically treated patients.