首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

低渗透砂岩气藏水锁伤害方式对比实验研究
引用本文:雷茹,任晓娟. 低渗透砂岩气藏水锁伤害方式对比实验研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 124-127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2008.03.025
作者姓名:雷茹  任晓娟
作者单位:西安石油大学石油工程学院
摘    要:通过室内实验研究, 对低渗透砂岩气藏3 种不同的水锁伤害方式进行了对比研究。研究表明, 低渗透砂岩气藏的水锁伤害具有普遍性和严重性, 其中欠压作用下的水锁伤害最小, 超压作用下的水锁伤害最大, 常压作用下的水锁伤害居中。因此, 在低渗透砂岩气藏的开采过程中应尽量避免使用水基工作液, 如果要用水基工作液, 应使压差处于欠压状态。

关 键 词:地震波场  波动方程  数值模拟  粘滞衰减  频率分布  

Experiment research on water locking damage in low-permeability sand gas reservoirs
LEI Ru,REN Xiao-juan. Experiment research on water locking damage in low-permeability sand gas reservoirs[J]. Northwest Oil & Gas Exploration, 2008, 20(3): 124-127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2008.03.025
Authors:LEI Ru  REN Xiao-juan
Affiliation:College of PetroleumEngineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Abstract:Based on the lab experimental research, the comparison is performed among the three types of water locking damage of low-permeability sand gas reservoirs. The research shows that water locking damage happens widely and seriously in low-permeability sand gas reservoirs. Among these three types of water locking damage, the water hocking under underpressure condition has the minimal damage, the damage under overpressure condition is relatively maximal, and the damage under normal pressure is relatively medial. We should not use water base working fluid, if have to, we should make it in the underpressure condition.
Keywords:natural suction  damage pressure  water locking damage  low-permeable sandstone reservoir
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩性油气藏》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩性油气藏》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号