| 基于生态足迹的建筑项目生态可持续性评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 滕佳颖,吴贤国,冉连月,覃亚伟,刘惠涛.基于生态足迹的建筑项目生态可持续性评价[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2016,38(Z2):104-108. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 滕佳颖 吴贤国 冉连月 覃亚伟 刘惠涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中科技大学，武汉 430074；吉林建筑大学 经济与管理学院， 吉林 130021；3．华中科技大学 附属同济医院，武汉 430030,华中科技大学，武汉 430074,华中科技大学，武汉 430075,华中科技大学，武汉 430076,华中科技大学 附属同济医院，武汉 430034 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文构建了项目全寿命周期生态足迹模型，涵盖全寿命周期消耗的能源、资源、产出的CO2、固体垃圾4个方面的生态足迹，提出了全寿命周期生态足迹空间效益指标，用于评价建筑项目的生态可持续性。研究了严寒地区4种不同结构类型（砖混平房、多层砖混楼房、多层钢混楼房、高层钢混楼房）住宅建筑的生态足迹和生态可持续性。结果表明，相比于平房，体形系数和窗墙比较小的高层住宅楼的生态可持续性高；在层数、体型系数和窗墙比都相同的情况下，钢混结构比砖混结构住宅楼的生态可持续性高；4种结构类型住宅楼中，高层钢混结构的生态可持续性较高，是较适宜推广的建筑结构类型。
|
| 关 键 词： | 生态足迹 空间效益 住宅建筑 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016/10/12 0:00:00 |
Study on eco-footprint-based eco-sustainability assessment of building projects |
| |
| Teng Jiayiny,Wu Xianguo,Ran Lianyue,Qing Yawei and Liu Huitao.Study on eco-footprint-based eco-sustainability assessment of building projects[J].Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University,2016,38(Z2):104-108. |
| |
| Authors: | Teng Jiayiny Wu Xianguo Ran Lianyue Qing Yawei and Liu Huitao |
| |
| Affiliation: | Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;Jilin Jianzhu University, Jilin 130021;3.TongJi Hospital,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;Jilin Jianzhu University, Jilin 130021;3.TongJi Hospital,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430031,Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;Jilin Jianzhu University, Jilin 130021;3.TongJi Hospital,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430032,Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;Jilin Jianzhu University, Jilin 130021;3.TongJi Hospital,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430033 and TongJi Hospital,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430034 |
| |
| Abstract: | This study established the life-cycle eco-footprint calculating model of building projects, which contained the eco-footprint in 4 aspects of life-cycle energy consumed, resource consumed, carbon emitted and solid waste produced. Space efficiency of life-cycle eco-footprint index was proposed, and used to assess the ecological sustainability of building projects. Then we investigated the eco-footprint and eco-sustainability of four different structure types (brick-concrete bungalow, multi-story brick-concrete, multi-story steel-concrete, high-rise steel-concrete) for residential building in severely cold areas. Results indicated that, compared with bungalow, high-rise building with relatively small shape coefficient and window-wall ratio had higher eco-sustainability; when the buildings had the same story, shape coefficient and window-wall ratio, steel-concrete building had higher eco-sustainability than brick-concrete building; high-rise steel-concrete structure had the greatest eco-sustainability during the 4 different structure type buildings, which was more suitable to promote. |
| |
| Keywords: | Eco-footprint Space Efficiency Residential Building |
|
| 点击此处可从《重庆建筑大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《重庆建筑大学学报》下载全文 |
|
