| Abstract: | Discusses the history and impact of peer review as an in-house quality control process. It is described as similar to previous steps in that it is developed and administered by psychologists but different because it goes beyond qualifying criteria for engaging in practice to deal with performance after an individual has become a qualified provider. The effects of peer review on several aspects of professional practice are discussed. Vehicles for obtaining information for review judgments are examined in terms of criteria, theoretical orientation, and benefit decisions. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
