首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Dead Zones in LX‐17 and PBX 9502
Authors:P&#x;Clark Souers  Henry&#x;G Andreski  Jan Batteux  Brad Bratton  Chris Cabacungan  Charles&#x;F Cook  Sabrina Fletcher  Raul Garza  Denise Grimsley  Jeff Handly  Andy Hernandez  Pat McMaster  John&#x;D Molitoris  Rick Palmer  Jim Prindiville  John Rodriguez  Dan Schneberk  Bradley Wong  Peter Vitello
Abstract:Pin and X‐ray corner turning data have been taken on ambient LX‐17 and PBX 9052, and the results are listed in tables as an aid to future modeling. The results have been modeled at 4 zones/mm with a reactive flow approach that varies the burn rate as a function of pressure. A single rate format is used to simulate failure and detonation in different pressure regimes. A pressure cut‐off must also be reached to initiate the burn. Corner turning and failure are modeled using an intermediate pressure rate region, and detonation occurs at high pressure. The TATB booster is also modeled using reactive flow, and X‐ray tomography is used to partition the ram‐pressed hemisphere into five different density regions. The model reasonably fits the bare corner turning experiment but predicts a smaller dead zone with steel confinement, in contradiction with experiment. The same model also calculates the confined and unconfined cylinder detonation velocities and predicts the failure of the unconfined cylinder at 3.75 mm radius. The PBX 9502 shows a smaller dead zone than LX‐17. An old experiment that showed a large apparent dead zone in Composition B was repeated with X‐ray transmission and no dead zone was seen. This confirms the idea that a variable burn rate is the key to modeling. The model also produces initiation delays, which are shorter than those found in time‐to‐detonation.
Keywords:Dead Zone  Corner Turning  X‐Ray  Failure  Reactive Flow
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号