首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中欧岩土工程勘察分级及岩土分类对比
引用本文:王小明,李勇,李刚.中欧岩土工程勘察分级及岩土分类对比[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(10):72-76.
作者姓名:王小明  李勇  李刚
作者单位:中国能源建设集团 广东省电力设计研究院,广州 510663
基金项目:广东省自然科学基金,广东省电力设计研究院科标项目
摘    要:国外市场开拓过程中,经常遇到要求采用欧洲标准进行勘察设计,迫使参与项目建设的总承包商、勘察设计以及施工单位必须熟悉并掌握运用欧洲标准。通过对欧洲岩土标准Eurocode 7与我国岩土规范的对比,总结归纳了二者在岩土工程勘察分级和岩土分类2个方面的差异性,欧洲标准通用性和理论性较强,具有较大的灵活性,通过差异研究可为我国相关勘察设计人员进行国外项目设计提供有益的借鉴。

关 键 词:岩土工程勘察  欧标  岩土分类  差异性  
收稿时间:2012-08-15
修稿时间:2013-10-16

Comparison of the Grading of Geotechnical Investigation and the Classification of Rock and Soil between Europe and China
WANG Xiao-ming , LI Yong , LI Gang.Comparison of the Grading of Geotechnical Investigation and the Classification of Rock and Soil between Europe and China[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2013,30(10):72-76.
Authors:WANG Xiao-ming  LI Yong  LI Gang
Affiliation:WANG Xiao-ming, LI Yong, LI Gang(Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute, China Energy Engineering Group Co., Ltd.,Guangzhou 510663, China)
Abstract:When exploring overseas markets, it is often required to adopt European Standards in the investigation and designing. The project participants including general contractor, surveyors and designers, and constructors have to command the use of European Standards. In this paper, we compared the Eurocode 7 and Chinese geotechnical code, and summarized their differences in the following two aspects the grading of geotechnical investigation, and the classification of rock and soil. We concluded that the Eurocode is more universal and theoretical, and is greatly flexible. The results could be used as reference for Chinese surveyors and designers in their overseas projects.
Keywords:geotechnical engineering investigation  Eurocode  classification of rock and soil  difference
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江科学院院报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江科学院院报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号