Developing a water infrastructure planning framework for the complex modern planning environment |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, Australia;2. Melbourne Water Corporation, Australia;1. Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano, 77, 38123, Trento, Italy;2. School of Development, Azim Premji University, PES Institute of Technology Campus, Pixel Park, B Block, Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bangalore 560100, India;1. ZIRIUS, Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Risiko- und Innovationsforschung der Universität Stuttgart, Seidenstr. 36, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany;2. University of Stuttgart, Germany;3. Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig, Germany;1. School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, Australia;2. Melbourne Water Corporation, Australia;1. Asset Management Operations Unit, i@Consulting (Pty) Ltd, Block@Nature, Block B, 472 Botterklapper Street, Lynnwood, Pretoria, South Africa;2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa;3. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1 -35131, Padova, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | Prevailing water infrastructure planning frameworks tend to present planning processes as rational and objective, paying little attention to whose interests are served. In reality, the planning process is inherently subjective and shaped by social and political dimensions. In this paper we develop a water infrastructure planning framework that is mindful of this context, beginning with a review of the evolution of planning theory. Existing frameworks are compared in order to develop a draft framework, which was then refined through consultation with water industry experts. Compared to the prevailing frameworks, our approach: (1) makes explicit the iterative process between decision analysis and decision taking, (2) ensures that cost-sharing arrangements are in place before final recommendations are made, (3) considers the effects of public and media perceptions about project outcomes on future planning, and (4) makes explicit the impact of government and community preferences on the planning process. We recommend this framework for use in both planning and analysis. |
| |
Keywords: | Water infrastructure Water planning Complexity in planning Integrated water management Urban planning Planning theory Planning framework Planning processes |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|