首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Allometric relationships from coppice structure of seven North American willow (Salix) species
Affiliation:1. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry Centre, P.O. Box 4000, Fredericton, N.B., E3B 5P7, Canada;2. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service – Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055, rue du PEPS, C.P. 10380, Succ. Ste.-Foy, Québec, Canada;1. Department of Chemistry, South Ural State University, Lenin pr. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia;2. Department of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry, University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain;1. Department of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada;2. Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway;3. Natural Resources Institute Finland, Reindeer Research Station, 99910 Kaamanen, Finland
Abstract:Biomass yield and component coppice growth traits were assessed in up to 20 clones from seven native North American willow species, Salix amygdaloides (SAM), Salix bebbiana (BEB), Salix discolor (DIS), S eriocephala (ERI), Salix humilis (HUM), Salix interior (INT), and Salix nigra (NIG), established together in a clonally replicated common-garden field test. Aboveground mass, coppice stem number, stem length, and stem basal diameter measurements on up to 20 of the largest stems from 2-yr-old coppiced plants showed that ERI had the greatest aboveground mass, followed by INT, and then a close grouping of BEB, DIS, and HUM; the “tree” willows, AMY and NIG, had the lowest yields. The tree willows were not as prolific in coppice stem sprout production as were the shrub willows. The greatest number of stem sprouts was produced by ERI, with one coppice producing 67 2-yr-old stem sprouts, and ERI also showed an atypical, non-negative relationship between stem size and stem number; whereas the other six willows showed a varying but expected negative relationship between coppice stem size and stem number. Species differences in allometric relationships highlight the need to develop species-specific models for more accurate non-destructive biomass yield estimation.
Keywords:Allometric growth relationships  Biomass yield estimation  Coppice structure  Willows
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号