首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Introducing the Food Fraud Initial Screening model (FFIS)
Affiliation:1. Food Fraud Initiative, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, 1129 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA;2. Division of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 1129 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA;3. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, N215 Business College Complex, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA;1. Food Fraud Initiative (MSUFFI), Michigan State University, 1129 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;2. Program in Public Health, Michigan State University, West Fee Hall, 909 Fee Road, Room 519, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;3. Institute of Crime Science, Yongin University, 470 Samga-Dong Cheoin-Gu Kyeonggi-Do, Seoul (Metropolitan), z/c 449-714, Republic of Korea;4. China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (CFSA), 7 Panjiayuna Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China;5. Moscow State University for Food Production (MSUFP), H.11, Volokolamsk Street, Moscow 125080, Russia
Abstract:Food Fraud is illegal deception for economic gain using food. There are many types of fraud including adulterant-substances, tampering, theft, diversion and gray marketing, simulations, misbranded, and intellectual property rights product counterfeiting. The concept is beginning to be addressed by laws, regulations, standards, and certifications. Regardless of the presence of an actual health hazard, Food Fraud incidents can: negatively impact sales, brand equity, market capitalization; violate regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley; and even lead to the criminal prosecution of corporate leaders. Emerging regulations and industry standards are requiring risk and vulnerability assessments of Food Fraud as a prerequisite to countermeasures and decision-making systems. These assessments and risk management systems are not familiar food safety tools. It is effective and efficient to utilize an enterprise risk management (ERM) framework, such as developed by the Committee of the Sponsoring Companies of the Treadway Commission (COSO). ERM risk assessment occurs into two stages: (1) a qualitative initial screening followed by (2) a more detailed quantitative assessment. All types of Food Fraud can result in enterprise-wide risks so an enterprise risk management system must cover all types of vulnerabilities. The model developed in this paper addresses the unmet need of the first stage referred to here as the Food Fraud Initial Screening (FFIS).
Keywords:Food Fraud  Food safety  Crime  Adulteration  Economically Motivated Adulteration (EMA)  Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号