Control of absorption columns in the bioethanol process: Influence of measurement uncertainties |
| |
| Authors: | Eduardo Eyng Ana MF Fileti |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-5020, USA;2. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA;1. Simulation and Dynamic Process Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil;2. Experimental Biorefinery of Organic Solid Waste (BERSO), Department of Nuclear Energy, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil;3. Laboratory of Refining and Cleaner Technology (LATECLIM), Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research (LITPEG), Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil |
| |
| Abstract: | The alcohol lost by evaporation during the bioethanol fermentation process may be collected and recovered using an absorption column. This equipment is also used in the carbonic gas treatment, a by-product from the sugar cane fermentation. In the present work, the development of nonlinear feedforward–feedback controllers, based on neural network inverse models, was proposed and tested to manipulate the absorbent flow rates. The control purposes are: to keep low ethanol concentration in the effluent gas phase from the first absorption column (ethanol recovery column); and to reduce the residual water concentration in the CO2 gas effluent from the second tower (CO2 treatment column).Based on simulation studies, the neural network (ANN) controller performance was compared with the conventional PID control scheme application. The best ANN architecture was set up according to the Foresse and Hagan (1997) criterion, while the PID parameters were found from the well-known Cohen–Coon Equations and trial-and-error fine tuning.Initially, performances were evaluated for the system without concentration measurement uncertainties. From these tests, the ANN controller presented the smallest response time and overshoot for regulator and servo problems. Three uncertainty levels were applied afterwards: 5%, 10%, and 15%.The ANN controller outperformed the PID for all uncertainty levels tested for the ethanol recovery column. For the CO2 treatment column, the ANN controller proceeded successfully under uncertainties of 5% and 10%, while the PID did not deal properly with uncertainties above 5%. The statistical F-test, besides the ITAE, ISE, and IAE performance criteria, were calculated for both controllers applications and then compared. They proved the superiority of the ANN control scheme.Using appropriately the proposed well-controlled absorption columns increases the efficiency of the bioethanol production plant and can also provide carbon credits by avoiding CO2 emission into the atmosphere. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
